From: Wendy Cheng Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: [RFC] NLM lock failover admin interface Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:09:41 -0400 Message-ID: <44917835.40805@redhat.com> References: <1150089943.26019.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <17550.11870.186706.36949@cse.unsw.edu.au> <1150268091.28264.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1150293654.28264.91.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060615140743.36CDC1BBAD@citi.umich.edu> Reply-To: linux clustering Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: Neil Brown , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux clustering Return-path: To: "William A.(Andy) Adamson" In-Reply-To: <20060615140743.36CDC1BBAD@citi.umich.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-cluster-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-cluster-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: William A.(Andy) Adamson wrote: >this discusion has centered around removing the locks of an export. >we also want the interface to ge able to remove the locks owned by a single >client. this is needed to enable client migration between replica's or between >nodes in a cluster file system. it is not acceptable to place an entire export >in grace just to move a small number of clients. > > > Andy, Gotcha ... forgot about NFS V4. BTW, the discussion has moved back to /proc interface. I agree we need to add one more layer of granularity into it. Glad you caught this flaw. -- Wendy