From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] [RFC] NLM lock failover admin interface Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:00:53 -0400 Message-ID: <20060612150053.GC31596@fieldses.org> References: <1150089943.26019.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FpnuT-0005qK-HH for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:00:57 -0700 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214] helo=pickle.fieldses.org) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1FpnuS-0004CU-GF for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:00:57 -0700 To: linux clustering In-Reply-To: <1150089943.26019.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:25:43AM -0400, Wendy Cheng wrote: > 2. Adding a new flag into "exportfs" command, say "h", such that > > "exportfs -uh *:/export_path" > > would un-export the entry and drop the NLM locks associated with the > entry. What does the kernel interface end up looking like in that case? --b. _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs