From: Steve Dickson Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] [RFC] NLM lock failover admin interface Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:23:02 -0400 Message-ID: <448DA2F6.8080605@RedHat.com> References: <1150089943.26019.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060612150053.GC31596@fieldses.org> <448D8BF7.7010105@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux clustering , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fpq8D-0003GI-6b for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:23:17 -0700 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1Fpq8C-00079W-34 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:23:17 -0700 To: Wendy Cheng In-Reply-To: <448D8BF7.7010105@redhat.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Wendy Cheng wrote: > The nice thing about this approach is the recovery part - the take-over > server can use the counter part command to export and set grace period > for one particular interface within the same system call. Actually this is a pretty clean and simple interface... imho.. The only issue I had was adding a flag to an older version and then having to carry that flag forward... So if this interface is accepted and added to the mainline nfs-utils (which it should be.. imho) that fact it is so clean and simple would make the back porting fairly trivial... steved. _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs