From: Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Question about the nocto option in 2.4 and 2.6
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:37:01 -0700
Message-ID: <1152293821.5385.2.camel@dyn9047022153>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Return-path: <nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92]
	helo=mail.sourceforge.net)
	by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FyuGD-0005C8-QT
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:37:01 -0700
Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151])
	by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.44) id 1FyuGD-0002PF-P8
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:37:02 -0700
Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com
	[9.17.195.106])
	by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	k67Hatdg019420
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
	for <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:36:55 -0400
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168])
	by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.6/NCO/VER7.0) with ESMTP id
	k67HbIGF153390
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:37:18 -0600
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id
	k67Has2L028421
	for <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:36:54 -0600
Received: from dyn9047022153 (dyn9047022153.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.22.153])
	by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	k67HasMG028408
	for <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:36:54 -0600
To: NFS List <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability,
	and testing." <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=nfs>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net

I'm consulting on an issue where we are seeing an increase in network
traffic between 2.4.21 and 2.6.9 kernels with the use of the nocto
option. This is raising a performance concern.

I'm wondering what has changed with this option between the two kernel
levels.

Thanks
Frank Filz



Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs