From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: Question about the nocto option in 2.4 and 2.6 Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 13:43:11 -0400 Message-ID: <1152294191.5714.2.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <1152293821.5385.2.camel@dyn9047022153> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: NFS List Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyuMS-0005nT-O9 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:43:28 -0700 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.4] ident=7411) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1FyuMS-0003E1-Q0 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:43:29 -0700 To: Frank Filz In-Reply-To: <1152293821.5385.2.camel@dyn9047022153> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 10:37 -0700, Frank Filz wrote: > I'm consulting on an issue where we are seeing an increase in network > traffic between 2.4.21 and 2.6.9 kernels with the use of the nocto > option. This is raising a performance concern. > > I'm wondering what has changed with this option between the two kernel > levels. Nothing much. What does nfsstat tell you has changed? Cheers, Trond Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs