From: Zwane Mwaikambo Subject: Re: PATCH 2 of 4] cpumask: export cpu_online_map and cpu_possible_map consistently Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 07:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <1154669759.21040.2353.camel@hole.melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Andrew Morton , Neil Brown , Linux NFS Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Return-path: In-reply-to: <1154669759.21040.2353.camel@hole.melbourne.sgi.com> To: Greg Banks Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Greg Banks wrote: > cpumask: ensure that the cpu_online_map and cpu_possible_map bitmasks, > and hence all the macros in that require them, are > available to modules for all supported combinations of architecture > and CONFIG_SMP. > > Signed-off-by: Greg Banks > --- > > arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 2 ++ > arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c | 1 + > arch/sh/kernel/smp.c | 1 + > kernel/sched.c | 3 +++ > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+) > > Index: linux-2.6.18-rc2/kernel/sched.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.18-rc2.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-08-01 17:53:25.000000000 +1000 > +++ linux-2.6.18-rc2/kernel/sched.c 2006-08-02 23:01:20.535457863 +1000 > @@ -4348,7 +4348,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_present_map); > > #ifndef CONFIG_SMP > cpumask_t cpu_online_map __read_mostly = CPU_MASK_ALL; > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_online_map); > cpumask_t cpu_possible_map; > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_possible_map); > cpumask_t cpu_online_map; > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_online_map); How come these are of different export types? Cheers, Zwane