From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: cel's patches for 2.6.18 kernels Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:16:46 -0400 Message-ID: <1158787006.5639.19.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <76bd70e30609201128r9188a17i51b779c6e1b569fc@mail.gmail.com> <20060920202010.GA22954@infradead.org> <76bd70e30609201353l7d8c063fp94916c509b08b24e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linux NFS Mailing List Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQ9Rb-0007BM-Ru for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:17:24 -0700 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.4]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1GQ9RZ-0007su-9p for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:17:24 -0700 To: Chuck Lever In-Reply-To: <76bd70e30609201353l7d8c063fp94916c509b08b24e@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:53 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > On 9/20/06, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > What's the merge plan for those patches? The transport switch and ipv6 > > code is eagerly anticipated by many people. > > About two thirds of the RPC transport switch is already in. > Twenty-ish more patches are going in 2.6.19. There remain roughly 30 > more patches that I need to walk through with Trond, and we can > probably get those into 2.6.20. I wouldn't mind moving them up, but > that's up to Trond. > > The IPv6 stuff is still being finished. Olaf may be able to help with > the NLM parts; Bull is still working through the NFS server parts; I'm > trying to act as integrator. I would like to line up some testers. I > think those may be as far out as three or four releases, but progress > is occurring -- note there are a lot more IPv6 patches in this > patchset than there were in 2.6.17's. What are the prospects for the server side? > Elimination of the BKL is complete except for a few unimportant spots. > All it needs is thorough testing on a multi-way ppc64 system to > reveal niggling problems. ...and a thorough review of the code. > The RPC slot table patches are completely rewritten in this release. > That will probably need some testing and review. Could you remind me again why we are so keen to get rid of the RPC slot table? Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs