From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: NFS corruption in 2.6.18.2? Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:09:11 -0500 Message-ID: <1163693351.9593.14.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <50e235a50d0f2b4fb34eed1c840565e3@swip.net> <20061115172947.GM10830@fit.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: "nfs@lists.sourceforge.net" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gkjo4-0004G9-W7 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:09:41 -0800 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.15] ident=[U2FsdGVkX18HDttE+wX+7aZbnBu+ScoyMA2JExN38PA=]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1Gkjo3-0003dK-TU for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:09:42 -0800 To: Kasparek Tomas In-Reply-To: <20061115172947.GM10830@fit.vutbr.cz> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 18:29 +0100, Kasparek Tomas wrote: > I have seen this behaviour with kernel 2.6.18 and above up to 19-rc4. > Reported this, but no response. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/28/89 Your test script doesn't use any form of locking. How are you ensuring that only one client has the file open at a time? Trond ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs