From: Olaf Kirch Subject: Re: kernel+userspace based nfsd running in parallel on linux? Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:21:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20061218072130.GA11302@suse.de> References: <1499049521@web.de> <200612161717.31090.bernd-schubert@gmx.de> <20061216215544.GA5968@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwCoa-0005do-UL for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:21:37 -0800 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1GwCoZ-0005ZH-V9 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:21:38 -0800 To: Peter =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C5strand?= In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 11:25:45AM +0100, Peter =C5strand wrote: > This is no problem, you can run both the nfs and mount service without th= e = > portmapper. They can even run on the same port. So, typically you run = Yeah, I know. But is that what he was asking for? Olaf -- = Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play okir@suse.de | / | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DDE= VDEV _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs