From: "Paarvai Naai" Subject: Re: [NFS] "mount: File exists" when trying to mount a second krb5 volume! Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:57:33 -0800 Message-ID: <52109fb10612011257s37d64003lb83fd0bbf623233f@mail.gmail.com> References: <20061120194700.135.qmail@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <1164228193.5694.38.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <52109fb10611221443w356ff6s4eae49ebb0d935ec@mail.gmail.com> <1164628684.3178.10.camel@localhost> <52109fb10611281950s50b5d618v21c5818f12ad6b74@mail.gmail.com> <52109fb10612011034v4f1feb27n59b6251edee6cfc1@mail.gmail.com> <1164998608.16282.6.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <52109fb10612011104l67d2f126hb53d82edb6fef64b@mail.gmail.com> <1165000607.17881.23.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1036457295==" Cc: nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Kostas Georgiou , Ian Kent Return-path: To: "Trond Myklebust" In-Reply-To: <1165000607.17881.23.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Mime-version: 1.0 Sender: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org List-ID: --===============1036457295== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_7523_509484.1165006653482" ------=_Part_7523_509484.1165006653482 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 12/1/06, Trond Myklebust wrote: > The procedures for dealing with kernel regressions are already well > established. I will be following them as usual. > > Trond > > That's good to know. What is the well-established procedure for Fedora? I really want to make sure it gets in ASAP. The importance of this (basically that the current bug *nearly completely breaks* krb5 with NFS) needs to be impressed on them. Thanks, Paarvai ------=_Part_7523_509484.1165006653482 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
On 12/1/06, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no > wrote:
The procedures for dealing with kernel regressions are already well
established. I will be following them as usual.

Trond


That's good to know.  What is the well-established procedure for Fedora?
I really want to make sure it gets in ASAP.  The importance of this
(basically that the current bug *nearly completely breaks* krb5 with
NFS) needs to be impressed on them.

Thanks,
Paarvai



------=_Part_7523_509484.1165006653482-- --===============1036457295== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ NFSv4 mailing list NFSv4@linux-nfs.org http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 --===============1036457295==--