From: Ian Kent Subject: Re: "mount: File exists" when trying to mount a second krb5 volume! Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:36:47 +0900 (WST) Message-ID: References: <20061120194700.135.qmail@web58109.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <1164228193.5694.38.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <52109fb10611221443w356ff6s4eae49ebb0d935ec@mail.gmail.com> <1164628684.3178.10.camel@localhost> <52109fb10611281950s50b5d618v21c5818f12ad6b74@mail.gmail.com> <52109fb10612011034v4f1feb27n59b6251edee6cfc1@mail.gmail.com> <1164998608.16282.6.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <52109fb10612011104l67d2f126hb53d82edb6fef64b@mail.gmail.com> <1165000607.17881.23.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <52109fb10612011257s37d64003lb83fd0bbf623233f@mail.gmail.com> <52109fb10612041055j41596e67racc9c3194fef413@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Kostas Georgiou , Trond Myklebust Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrQAy-0000b2-C8 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:36:57 -0800 Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1GrQAy-0002O0-Ik for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:36:57 -0800 To: Paarvai Naai In-Reply-To: <52109fb10612041055j41596e67racc9c3194fef413@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Paarvai Naai wrote: > I have added this bug to bugzilla.redhat.com and requested that they > push Trond's patch into their source RPMs as soon as possible. Sorry if > I'm stepping on anyone toes, but I just felt that I had to proceed since I > didn't receive a response to my previous question (see below). Sorry, I meant to say to log a bug. But, looking at the history in this thread, it appears that a solution hasn't been reached. > > Thanks, > Paarvai > > On 12/1/06, Paarvai Naai wrote: > > > > On 12/1/06, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > > > The procedures for dealing with kernel regressions are already well > > > established. I will be following them as usual. > > > > > > Trond > > > > > > > > That's good to know. What is the well-established procedure for Fedora? > > I really want to make sure it gets in ASAP. The importance of this > > (basically that the current bug *nearly completely breaks* krb5 with > > NFS) needs to be impressed on them. > > > > Thanks, > > Paarvai > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs