From: Ming Zhang Subject: question about fh_copy Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:20:08 -0500 Message-ID: <1169911208.2767.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: blackmagic02881@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HApLh-0001pl-2E for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:20:13 -0800 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.237]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HApLh-0000Ur-MG for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:20:14 -0800 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so1817317wxd for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:20:09 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi All A question about fh_copy(). This function is called many times on argument passed directly from nfs clients. If a malicious nfs client forge a fh, then fh_copy can invoke oops quite easily. shall we always call fh_verify before call fh_copy? Thanks! Ming -- http://blackmagic02881.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs