From: wolfgang@noten5.maas-noten.de Subject: mount problems - possibly 64bit Date: 21 Feb 2007 11:38:27 -0000 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJpoO-0007fk-3i for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:39:04 -0800 Received: from maas-noten.de ([213.239.193.103]) by mail.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HJpoO-0004kq-Kh for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:39:06 -0800 List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net I am trying to replace servers in an existing network by better ones (kernel 2.6.16 on amd 64bit) The server has nfs-server-2.2beta51-225.x86_64.rpm installed Trying to mount from an old (32bit) client ends with mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on server:/data The server reports: /data has been mounted by 192.168.75.31 Trying to mount from a new system (2.6.16 running on a Pentium D) the result is mount: cannot mount server:/data read-only Again the server says that the mount was successful Wolfgang ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs