From: Bernd Schubert Subject: Re: mount problems - possibly 64bit Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:25:37 +0100 Message-ID: <200702211325.37444.bernd-schubert@gmx.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: wolfgang@noten5.maas-noten.de To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJqXa-0004Aq-4v for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 04:25:47 -0800 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by mail.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HJqXb-0003sT-Nq for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 04:25:48 -0800 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Wednesday 21 February 2007 12:38, wolfgang@noten5.maas-noten.de wrote: > I am trying to replace servers in an existing network by better ones > (kernel 2.6.16 on amd 64bit) The server has > nfs-server-2.2beta51-225.x86_64.rpm installed Thats the userspace server, isn't it? Take the kernel server (or at least = unfs3, if you really need a userspave daemon). -- = Bernd Schubert PCI / Theoretische Chemie Universit=E4t Heidelberg INF 229 69120 Heidelberg ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DDE= VDEV _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs