From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: nearing nfs-utils 1.1.0 and statd changes. Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:52:07 +1100 Message-ID: <17917.49815.63101.888846@notabene.brown> References: <17914.20117.186786.830574@notabene.brown> <4d569c330703160730y28be4800p858c64f07a3e5e99@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Steve Dickson To: "Kevin Coffman" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HT4Ef-0007xU-Dw for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:52:23 -0700 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15] helo=mx2.suse.de) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1HT4Eg-0004Jj-Lp for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:52:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: message from Kevin Coffman on Friday March 16 List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Friday March 16, kwc@citi.umich.edu wrote: > Hi Neil, > Is it still the intention to change the default to build mount.nfs by > default for 1.1.0? Yes. Which means the code needs some careful review as it needs to be setuid-root. So between -rc1 and -final I'll be looking at it carefully, and I would be great if other did too.... NeilBrown ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs