From: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: nfs-utils, e_maptype
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 08:39:19 -0500
Message-ID: <EXNANE01G5aYY61LEdy00000081@exnane01.hq.netapp.com>
References: <20070307022107.GC27862@fieldses.org>
	<200703072123.47224.okir@lst.de>
	<20070307212844.GQ26553@fieldses.org>
	<200703080949.54293.okir@lst.de>
	<EXNANE01Ogl4rhYQYx30000007d@exnane01.hq.netapp.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0703081426170.25244@maggie.lkpg.cendio.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Peter =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C3=81Etrand?= <astrand@cendio.se>
Return-path: <nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92]
	helo=mail.sourceforge.net)
	by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HPIqb-0002jZ-RF
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:39:58 -0800
Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37])
	by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HPIqd-0007gY-T3
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:40:00 -0800
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703081426170.25244@maggie.lkpg.cendio.se>
References: <20070307022107.GC27862@fieldses.org>
	<200703072123.47224.okir@lst.de>
	<20070307212844.GQ26553@fieldses.org>
	<200703080949.54293.okir@lst.de>
	<EXNANE01Ogl4rhYQYx30000007d@exnane01.hq.netapp.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0703081426170.25244@maggie.lkpg.cendio.se>
List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability,
	and testing." <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=nfs>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net

At 08:28 AM 3/8/2007, Peter =C3=85strand wrote:
>Users of the "original" unfsd could then switch to unfs3, which doesn't =

>depend on e_maptype. =


Good point - and unfs3 is there in the main ones already.

Okay, I agree let's ignore unfsd altogether.

Tom.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DDE=
VDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs