From: Olaf Kirch Subject: Re: nfs-utils patch for mount-reserved-port Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:14:35 +0100 Message-ID: <200703121814.36739.olaf.kirch@oracle.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: "Talpey, Thomas" To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQo8s-0000L6-IL for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:17:02 -0700 Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1HQo8t-0008GJ-6c for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:17:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Monday 12 March 2007 16:55, Talpey, Thomas wrote: > Only create a mount-time reserved port socket for kernels > which require it (pre-2.1.32/nfs_mount_version 1). I like this approach. Whether or not to remove compatibility for ancient versions is another debate - but anything that reduces the number of privports mount consumes is certainly a big advantage. Olaf -- Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play okir@lst.de | / | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs