From: Wendy Cheng Subject: Re: flock and lockf over NFS and the 'pid' in lockd requests. Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:16:40 -0400 Message-ID: <46356DA8.4000902@redhat.com> References: <17973.19011.690165.95878@notabene.brown> <1177899233.6400.58.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <17973.26166.844328.279844@notabene.brown> <46356C57.1040601@redhat.com> Reply-To: wcheng@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Trond Myklebust To: Neil Brown Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HiN9R-0007If-9M for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:06:13 -0700 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HiN9T-0003zs-LS for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:06:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: <46356C57.1040601@redhat.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Wendy Cheng wrote: > Neil Brown wrote: > >> >> What would you think of an "noflock" option to allow people to choose >> the old practice of not supporting flock??? >> Sorry, shouldn't make a joke as previous post - I should have said this is a sensible solution for now. -- Wendy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs