From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Portmap - was Re: Does mountd/statd really need to listen on a privileged port?? Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20070424171708.GA7936@infradead.org> References: <17958.48121.280256.493824@notabene.brown> <462CB496.6000308@RedHat.com> <17965.15503.703515.820793@notabene.brown> <200704240908.39672.olaf.kirch@oracle.com> <20070424161027.GA30213@infradead.org> <462E38B9.5020808@RedHat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Neil Brown , Christoph Hellwig , Matthias Koenig , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a , Olaf Kirch , anibal@debian.org To: Steve Dickson Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgOdl-0006bS-35 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:17:21 -0700 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1HgOdm-0002Sg-E5 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:17:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <462E38B9.5020808@RedHat.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:04:57PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > >Although not the fastes approach the only long-term viable one > >would be to update the glibc rpc code for the new TIRPC APIs and > >IPv6 support. Even if it's unclear whether Uli would actually > >include it that gives a better start to avoid all kinds of security > >or useability-related regressions. > Well I have a strong hunch that the glibc people do not want anything > to do with changing *any* of the RPC code. That's the impression I got, yes. > I know for a fact that they > are very sorry the accepted in the first place... so with > that type of motivation I really think it would be very painful > to sell them on take any patches... at all... > > Secondly, having the to debug and fix a small part of the > RPC code in glibc, I have experienced how truly difficult > it is work with such a large beast... so I pretty confident > that breaking out the RPC into a library we can maintain > ourselves is a good direction to move... Well, even with a separate library it's probably better to start out with the glibc code to bug to bug compatible. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs