From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 Revised] NLM - lock failover Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:41:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20070419144111.GA2670@infradead.org> References: <46156F3F.3070606@redhat.com> <4625204D.1030509@redhat.com> <462669D2.1070209@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net To: Wendy Cheng Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HeXov-0000Wb-Fu for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:41:13 -0700 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HeXow-0006TU-RM for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:41:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: <462669D2.1070209@redhat.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 02:56:18PM -0400, Wendy Cheng wrote: > Arjan, I need an objective opinion and am wondering whether you could > give me some advices ... > > I'm quite upset about this Christoph guy and really want to "talk back". > Will my response be too strong that ends up harm my later on patches ? I don't mind strong answers, but I'd generally prefer clueful strong answers :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs