From: Bryan O'Sullivan Subject: Re: NFS caching bug is back Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:25:48 -0700 Message-ID: <4627980C.2090308@serpentine.com> References: <46278E27.8050705@atmos.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net To: David Warren Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HeZSA-0004QC-2n for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:25:50 -0700 Received: from hierophant.serpentine.com ([64.81.58.173]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HeZSB-0005Bv-A0 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:25:52 -0700 In-Reply-To: <46278E27.8050705@atmos.washington.edu> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net David Warren wrote: > A bug that we turned in a while ago is back in the 2.6.20 kernels, only > worse. I have found it in 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.20.7. These symptoms look similar to this bug: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8305 Which has been around since 2.6.17. Do you find that the problem magically resolves itself after a little while?