From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Does mountd/statd really need to listen on a privileged
 port??
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:36:50 -0400
Message-ID: <46279AA2.4040105@RedHat.com>
References: <17950.44333.118970.276558@notabene.brown>
	<4623BCD9.3090501@RedHat.com>
	<200704171208.51797.olaf.kirch@oracle.com>
	<17957.50539.958277.446719@notabene.brown>
	<17958.48121.280256.493824@notabene.brown>
	<46278794.6050307@RedHat.com> <20070419152149.GA9101@fieldses.org>
	<46278DE3.9020509@RedHat.com> <20070419155044.GD9101@fieldses.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Matthias Koenig <mkoenig@novell.com>,
	nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, jfs@computer.org,
	Olaf Kirch <olaf.kirch@oracle.com>, anibal@debian.org
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070419155044.GD9101@fieldses.org>
Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net


J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:42:27AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>> And it that upstream version could still live in the nfs-utils tree,
>>> couldn't it?  Or it annoying to build multiple binary packages from one
>>> upstream tree for some reason?
>> Its not so much the annoyance... its the fact that other services
>> like NIS also depend on portmap/rpcbind. Why should we require an
>> AFS shop to install nfs-utils just so they can run NIS?
> 
> Right.  I mean:  can't you build separate portmap and nfs-utils rpms
> from the same nfs-utils source, and then make AFS depend only on the
> portmap package?  I thought it was pretty common to do that sort of
> thing.
Talking with people that know more about rpms that I ever
want to know ;-) Yes... it is possible to create multiple
rpms, with different names, from one source tree and it is
done, but it does cause confusion... so its not clear how
common it is...

> 
> But maybe there's no particular advantage to having the two together
> anyway.
I really don't see any...  I think it would become for a headache
than its worth...

steved.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs