From: "Kevin Coffman" Subject: Re: RFC - NFS startup order Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:16:01 -0400 Message-ID: <4d569c330704040916m4fe927a9g947cfafd7affb319@mail.gmail.com> References: <17937.44243.21793.371809@notabene.brown> <20070403084523.GA32339@sith.mimuw.edu.pl> <17939.5332.757746.617356@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Jan Rekorajski To: "Neil Brown" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ89T-0006Uv-Cz for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:16:03 -0700 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HZ89T-0008Bc-Mg for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:16:05 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so777865ugc for ; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:16:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <17939.5332.757746.617356@notabene.brown> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 4/3/07, Neil Brown wrote: > On Tuesday April 3, baggins@sith.mimuw.edu.pl wrote: > > On Tue, 03 Apr 2007, Neil Brown wrote: > > > > > 3.1. SERVER STARTUP > > > > > > > > > A/ mount -t nfsd /proc/fs/nfsd > > > This filesystem needs to be mount before most daemons, > > > particularly exportfs, mountd, svcgssd, idmapd. > > > It could be mounted once, or the script that starts each daemon > > > could test if it is mounted and mount it if not. > > > > mount -t rpc_pipefs /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs > > This filesystem must be mounted before svcgssd and idmapd daemons. > > > > Is rpc_pipefs really needed for svcgssd? or just for 'gssd' and > 'idmapd'. rpc_pipefs is not currently used in svcgssd. > I gather that a SIGHUP to idmapd will cause it to open the serve > channels after they have been made available. It is also sufficient > to SIGHUP idmapd after mounting rpc_pipefs if rpc_pipefs is mounted > later for some reason? The short answer is no. The current sighup processing in idmapd only attempts to open/reopen the server channels. (Probably only because the "normal" system starts the NFS client first, and then the NFS server.) It is possible to start two instances of idmapd -- one servicing only the client, and one servicing only the server. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs