From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: inconsistent mount attributes (ro/rw), RHEL5 / Netapp Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:33:42 -0400 Message-ID: <1179239622.6464.28.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> References: <4627B3DD.5050409@amd.com> <1177007479.6623.14.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <4627D303.8060009@amd.com> <1177020662.6628.30.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <4627EBFC.2090704@amd.com> <462CFC92.2080201@amd.com> <463B97E6.4030009@amd.com> <1178314889.6533.19.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1178379473.4559.24.camel@raven.themaw.net> <1178385472.6561.43.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070514131743.GG31764@petra.dvoda.cz> <1179149048.6858.5.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1179153555.3811.57.camel@raven.themaw.net> <1179157631.6474.8.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1179158812.3811.68.camel@raven.themaw.net> <17992.58783.827023.697258@notabene.brown> <1179184319.6467.7.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <4649BC6F.2010906@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Neil Brown , Paul Krizak , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Ian Kent To: chuck.lever@oracle.com Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hny68-0005hL-IJ for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 May 2007 07:33:56 -0700 Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1Hny6A-0003ki-At for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 May 2007 07:33:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4649BC6F.2010906@oracle.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 09:58 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > Just kicking it out there: why not revert the kernel back to the > previous state of affairs where "nosharedcache" was the default, and > then let user space handle sharing or not sharing, documenting clearly > what the implications are in the mount(8) or nfs(5) man pages? User > space is smart enough to emit a warning about mixing security flavors, > for instance, as suggested above. Read the thread. See my previous answers. Trond ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs