From: Ian Kent Subject: Re: Portmap - was Re: Does mountd/statd really need to listen on a privileged port?? Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 12:22:12 +0800 Message-ID: <1178079732.3393.8.camel@raven.themaw.net> References: <17958.48121.280256.493824@notabene.brown> <200704252214.03069.okir@lst.de> <17968.18279.424773.589417@notabene.brown> <200704261059.50688.okir@lst.de> <4630A32E.6000006@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hj6Nh-0004NH-WC for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 01 May 2007 21:23:58 -0700 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1Hj6Nh-0000GW-6l for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 01 May 2007 21:24:00 -0700 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E2F21A8AF for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 00:23:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.49.97.36] (unknown [203.59.241.52]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B673BC75 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 00:23:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4630A32E.6000006@redhat.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 09:03 -0400, Peter Staubach wrote: > Olaf Kirch wrote: > > On Thursday 26 April 2007 08:32, Neil Brown wrote: > > > >> Following this logic, should we add rpcbind functionality to portmap > >> rather than throw it out and start with something less known??? > >> > > > > I'm not sure. The rpcbind code isn't exactly pretty, but neither is > > portmap. > > > > Anyway, I guess in order to prove my point about the sunrpc library > > I should cough up some code to prove it can be done. I'll be uploading > > some patches later tonight or tomorrow. > > > > Before we go too far down the road of ignoring all of the work that > the engineers at Sun have been doing on the RPC library, is there a > way of getting a newer version of the RPC support to start with? The > current stuff is quite old. I managed to find a copy of tirpc99 and the code layout looks very different. Get it from http://members.plug.org.au/~raven/tirpc99/. We would need to review the license as I think there's a reason we see the tirpc 2.3 version everywhere. Ian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs