From: AK Subject: NFS & RPCBIND relation Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 08:11:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <206092.69095.qm@web56615.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0506743060==" To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjGUn-0006kB-Iy for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 02 May 2007 08:12:00 -0700 Received: from web56615.mail.re3.yahoo.com ([66.196.97.59]) by mail.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HjGUo-0004J5-77 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 02 May 2007 08:12:00 -0700 List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net --===============0506743060== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1581789353-1178118712=:69095" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --0-1581789353-1178118712=:69095 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there, OS: Solaris 9, NFS v3 *** At one point the "nfs.client" on our server was NOT turned ON. At thi= s time we noticed that the rpcbind(process) was consistently about 12-13%= in CPU use. Which seemed strange but could not find an answer to this. N= FSD stayed up 11%. The nfs.client as I found out, started lockd and other= programs "nlockmgr & status" important for NFS file locking from the cli= ents perspective.=20 Q1) Is this normal for rpcbind ? If yes/no then can anyone explain, why d= id our rpcbind cpu usage dropped to almost less then 1% consistently afte= r we TUNRNED ON nfs.client on our server. Since I started NFS client on t= he server I never saw it going up above 1%. ??? Q2) what does nfs.client have to do with RPCBIND's above described behavi= our ??? =20 Any feedback will be greatly helpful! =20 ~thanks ~al =20 --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. --0-1581789353-1178118712=:69095 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi there,

OS: Solaris 9, NFS v3

*** At one point the "= nfs.client" on our server was NOT turned ON. At this time we noticed= that the rpcbind(process) was consistently about 12-13% in CPU use. Whic= h seemed strange but could not find an answer to this. NFSD stayed up 11%= . The nfs.client as I found out, started lockd and other programs "nlockm= gr & status" important for NFS file locking from the clients perspect= ive.

Q1) Is this normal for rpcbind ? If yes/no then can anyone e= xplain, why did our rpcbind cpu usage dropped to almost less then 1% cons= istently after we TUNRNED ON nfs.client on our server. Since I started NF= S client on the server I never saw it going up above 1%. ???

Q2) w= hat does nfs.client have to do with RPCBIND's above described behaviour ?= ??
 
Any feedback will be greatly helpful!
 
~thanks ~al


Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos. --0-1581789353-1178118712=:69095-- --===============0506743060== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ --===============0506743060== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs --===============0506743060==--