From: Peter Staubach Subject: Re: Understanding nfsstat output Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:30:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4638F4E8.6030904@redhat.com> References: <953249.36987.qm@web56613.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net To: AK Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjLTB-0006wR-6M for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 02 May 2007 13:30:39 -0700 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HjLTD-000145-5M for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 02 May 2007 13:30:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <953249.36987.qm@web56613.mail.re3.yahoo.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net AK wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I am trying to understand the output of nfsstat to better understand > and tweak NFS performance for our machines. > > Following is the output from our Solaris 9, NFSv3 running server: > > I am concerned about the "badcalls" for "Server nfs" output, is this > normal or something is wrong. We have some of our clients mounting the > exported File system with rsize & wsize = 32K, Could this be the > problem, is there a way to narrow it down? > > Any feedback is greatly appreciated! > > ~thanks ~al > > # nfsstat -s > > Server rpc: > Connection oriented: > calls badcalls nullrecv badlen xdrcall dupchecks > 101090599 0 0 0 0 62704096 > dupreqs > 7038 > Connectionless: > calls badcalls nullrecv badlen xdrcall dupchecks > 17121084 0 0 0 0 7028935 > dupreqs > 69076 > > Server nfs: > calls badcalls > 118266383 57138 > Version 2: (0 calls) > null getattr setattr root lookup readlink > 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% > read wrcache write create remove rename > 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% > link symlink mkdir rmdir readdir statfs > 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% > Version 3: (117965148 calls) > null getattr setattr lookup access readlink > 1 0% 185486 0% 1906 0% 41482 0% 24091 0% 487 0% > read write create mkdir symlink mknod > 47680376 40% 69594128 58% 2516 0% 2 0% 80 0% 0 0% > remove rmdir rename link readdir > readdirplus > 1658 0% 4 0% 126 0% 7 0% 1890 0% 2726 0% > fsstat fsinfo pathconf commit > 222331 0% 9 0% 2 0% 205840 0% > > Server nfs_acl: > Version 2: (0 calls) > null getacl setacl getattr access > 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% > Version 3: (111 calls) > null getacl setacl > 0 0% 73 65% 38 34% > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I would suggest asking the Solaris folks for the interpretation for the output fields in the Solaris version of nfsstat. That said, the number appears to be a small percentage of the total number of calls as to not worry very much about. ps ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs