From: Stuart Anderson Subject: Re: NFSv4 uninitialized mtime Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:23:56 -0700 Message-ID: <20070628032356.GB18337@ligo.caltech.edu> References: <20070627233114.GA14508@ligo.caltech.edu> <1182987805.5311.77.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070628004904.GK9806@ligo.caltech.edu> <20070628005957.GA16461@ligo.caltech.edu> <20070627211559.e9fc68dd.jlayton@redhat.com> <20070628025327.GA18337@ligo.caltech.edu> <7FEBE408-60C8-41F3-99A3-9ABF1A381D44@sun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Layton , Trond Myklebust To: Spencer Shepler Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I3kc3-0006bw-P4 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:24:07 -0700 Received: from acrux.ligo.caltech.edu ([131.215.115.14]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1I3kc4-0007Ro-Vi for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:24:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: <7FEBE408-60C8-41F3-99A3-9ABF1A381D44@sun.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 10:09:23PM -0500, Spencer Shepler wrote: > >Somewhat related is the reason that we are tring NFSV4 on Linux > >clients is > >that with NFSV3 ACL's do not work between Linux and Solaris if the > >filesystem > >on the Solaris server is ZFS, e.g., cp -p will generate interesting > >error > >messages. While I would rather stay with NFSV4 if possible, has anyone > >gotten this configuration to work with V3? > > It will not. ZFS does not support the "old" ACL definition; only > NFSv4 support. > Understood, so this is probably not a bug and just a feature, but why does a Linux client try and then generate application level errors? A Solaris client is willing to NFS mount vers=3 a ZFS filesystem and then run GNU cp -rp, for example, without complaint. Perhaps there is a simple method determine if ACL's are available/supported on a particular NFS mount? Thanks. -- Stuart Anderson anderson@ligo.caltech.edu http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/~anderson ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs