From: Jeff Layton Subject: Re: NFSv4 uninitialized mtime Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 07:19:43 -0400 Message-ID: <20070630071943.683b5271.jlayton@redhat.com> References: <46857F06.102@ligo.caltech.edu> <20070629181234.b70f6f7f.jlayton@redhat.com> <46858831.2040504@ligo.caltech.edu> <20070629223528.fe7ac38d.jlayton@redhat.com> <4685C95C.4050008@ligo.caltech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Stuart Anderson , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net To: "Erik A. Espinoza" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I4azY-0004BX-Co for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 04:19:52 -0700 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1I4azb-00076q-K5 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 04:19:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4685C95C.4050008@ligo.caltech.edu> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:09:16 -0700 "Erik A. Espinoza" wrote: > Interestingly enough, using Solaris as a client and server does not have > mtime issues. > They're probably using NFSv3 semantics and are clobbering the mtime and atime irregardless of the attrmask sent back. > > Should I attempt to get a tcpdump of Sol NFSv4 server and client combo > doing the same thing? I doubt it will tell us more than we already know. The captures we already have indicate that they are not following the RFC. > > Erik > > Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:31:13 -0700 > > "Erik A. Espinoza" wrote: > > > >> Jeff Layton wrote: > >>> The attribute mask seems to be zeroed out here as well. What sort of server is this? > >>> -- Jeff > >>> > >> # cat /etc/release > >> Solaris 10 11/06 s10x_u3wos_10 X86 > >> Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > >> Use is subject to license terms. > >> Assembled 14 November 2006 > >> # uname -v > >> Generic_118855-36 > >> > > > > Ok, so looks like Solaris 10 has this bug too. You might want to open a > > case with Sun if you have a support contract with them. Let them know > > that they're not sending a correct attribute mask when they send an > > exclusive create reply. > > > > You might also try opening a bug about this at the opensolaris site. > > > > -- > Erik A. Espinoza > Systems Administrator > LIGO/Caltech - MS 18-34 > Pasadena, CA 91125 > Ph: 626-395-8517 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs > -- Jeff Layton ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs