From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make sure unlock is really an unlock when cancelling a lock Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:35:11 -0400 Message-ID: <1181752511.6151.5.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> References: <1181581269.8988.42.camel@dyn9047022153> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: NFS List To: Frank Filz Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HyVoY-0001wo-9v for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:35:22 -0700 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.15] ident=[U2FsdGVkX1928uTxgHivUGQQm7hcv35dOpUl5rOAwoc=]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1HyVoT-0007oK-JP for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:35:20 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1181581269.8988.42.camel@dyn9047022153> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:01 -0700, Frank Filz wrote: > I ran into a curious issue when a lock is being canceled. The > cancellation results in a lock request to the vfs layer instead of an > unlock request. This is particularly insidious when the process that Any idea why the cancellation turns into a lock request? I really don't want to apply a patch that just appears to paper over the problem. Cheers Trond ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs