From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: nfs4 filesystem mounted via the "bind" option reports wrong fstype Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:40:59 -0400 Message-ID: <20070827184059.GI3118@fieldses.org> References: <46D318D3.9020101@oxeva.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jkar8572@users.sourceforge.net To: Gabriel Barazer Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46D318D3.9020101@oxeva.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:32:51PM +0200, Gabriel Barazer wrote: > Hi, > > A nfs4 filesystem, mounted elsewhere via the "bind" option (the usual > way to do with nfsv4 and its pseudofs), reports wrong fstype "nfs" > instead of "nfs4" filesystem. > An example is much easier to understand : > Server-side : > - /exports is the pseudo root filesystem (fsid=0 option in /etc/exports) > - /exports/data is a mountpoint for another filesystem (not the same > device-id as /exports). This condition seems to be what triggers the bug > - /exports/data must be exported with the "nohide" option (again, the > usual way to do se with nfsv4) > > Client-side : > - mount server:/ on /imports > - mount "bind" /imports/data on /home/data There's no reason not to just mount server:/exports/data directly at /home/data; the bind mounts are just a workaround for the somewhat primitive exports facility on the server side. > (this magically shows a second nfs mount in /proc/mounts) > And here is the bug : this second mount is of fstype "nfs" instead of > "nfs4" although the options field contains "vers=4". But, yes, that sounds like a bug, thanks. --b.