From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH] 64 bit ino support for NFS server Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:51:22 -0400 Message-ID: <20070817165122.GC28529@fieldses.org> References: <46B37DE6.80706@redhat.com> <46B38206.6050504@redhat.com> <20070804223256.GA1155@fieldses.org> <46C476DF.3070607@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Neil Brown , Andrew Morton , NFS List To: Peter Staubach Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IM52i-0004yQ-F4 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:51:24 -0700 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214] helo=fieldses.org) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1IM52k-0007OD-IL for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:51:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <46C476DF.3070607@redhat.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 12:10:07PM -0400, Peter Staubach wrote: > Attached is a new patch which should address the issues raised > by Bruce. Thanks! > I also haven't come to any conclusions regarding the value of > lease_get_mtime() and whether it should or should not be invoked > by fill_post_wcc() too. I chose not to change this because I > thought that it was safer to leave well enough alone. If we > decide to make a change, it can be done separately. OK. Only superficial complaints: - There were some minor whitespace oddities; running the patch through scripts/checkpatch.pl may be the quickest way to catch those. - This would be better as two, maybe three separate patches; e.g. moving the lease_get_mtime out of encode_fattr3 could be done separately first. Ideally we'd do some trivial transformations like that, followed by one change that actually changes the inode behavior. That makes the whole thing trival to review. I fixed up the first and added the result to git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-mm so it should show up in the next -mm. I'd happily replace it by a more finely split up version if that was something you could whip up in a few minutes. --b. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs