From: Ryusuke Konishi Subject: Re: [PATCH] unfsd: fix invalid argument error for setattr request Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:41:00 +0900 Message-ID: <200708210641.AA00240@paprika.lab.ntt.co.jp> References: <20070816133350.GB9941@fieldses.org> Reply-To: ryusuke@osrg.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Peter_Astrand , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INNQl-0002q2-SH for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:41:35 -0700 Received: from tama55.ecl.ntt.co.jp ([129.60.39.103]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1INNQp-0004pj-SV for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:41:40 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20070816133350.GB9941@fieldses.org> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> All right. >> As you say, the mail to unfsd maintainers was returned by >> Host unknown. (Sigh) >> It seems to have little hope to modify unfsd for this. > >Have you tried the debian bug-tracking system? Maybe they're >practically speaking the only maintainers that unfsd has now. Thanks! I could make contact with a package maintainer of unfsd. Regards, Ryusuke Konishi ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs