From: kenneth johansson <ken@kenjo.org>
Subject: Re: lockd not responding
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:52:40 +0200
Message-ID: <1190573560.7249.3.camel@duo>
References: <fc84aa$o11$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<20070912202721.d8f70ac1.jlayton@redhat.com>
	<1190407932.6721.42.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <1190407932.6721.42.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net


On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 16:52 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 20:27 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:26:02 +0000 (UTC)
> > kenneth johansson <ken@kenjo.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Got a warning from the lock validating check again and
> > > later a unresponsive lockd with a backtrace this time
> > > actually at the same place the lock warning was on.
> > 
> > FWIW, I think I ran into the exact same problem recently. I opened a
> > BZ case for it so I wouldn't forget about it, but haven't had time to
> > track it down:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280311
> > 
> > I'm not certain that lockd was stuck at the time, since I had some
> > other things going on with the box, but it may have been...
> 
> Does the attached patch help?

Yes it does. 

I tested Jeffs lock unlock loop and it got the lock warning in a minute
or two the three times I tested without the patch and has run for about
an hour now with with no warning.

So there is an Ack from me on this fix.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs