From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/4] svc: Fix skip computation in svc_defer and svc_revisit Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:03:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20071023180354.GE30496@fieldses.org> References: <20071019214058.31422.35615.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> <20071019214523.31422.28978.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> <20071023024530.GB6354@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: neilb@suse.de, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net To: Greg Banks Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkO6c-000539-B4 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:03:54 -0700 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214] helo=fieldses.org) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1IkO6h-0004rO-Ge for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:03:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20071023024530.GB6354@sgi.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 12:45:30PM +1000, Greg Banks wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 04:45:23PM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote: > > > > The rq_arg.len includes the size of the transport header. The computations > > assumed that it did not. > > ok, assuming that your latest svc_rdma_xdr_decode_req(), which I > haven't read yet, doesn't change rq_arg.len as it parses the RDMA > chunking header. > > The reason I mention that is that one set of patches I was working > with some time ago had different semantics for rq_arg.len; when > parsing the chunking header, rq_arg.len was adjusted downward as > rq_head[0].iov_base was adjusted forward. This kept rq_arg.len equal > to the sum of rq_{head[0],pages[...],tail[0]}.iov_len, which seemed > like a good idea. > > But your way seems valid too. The integrity and privacy code may be a particularly unpleasant source of assumptions about the various length fields; see e.g. unwrap_integ_data() and unwrap_priv_data(). (But maybe nobody cares about krb5i/krb5p over rdma?) --b. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs