From: Kumar Gala Subject: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:52:44 -0500 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: neilb@suse.de, bfields@fieldses.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkSbT-0000qe-Av for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:52:03 -0700 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57] ident=[U2FsdGVkX1+Y5RXyHT48r41kLXskRtvMxthfyYlIBfY=]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1IkSbY-00079Z-IP for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:52:08 -0700 List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net I'm looking into an issue with LTP's ustat01 & ustat02 tests in which they report the following: ustat01 1 FAIL : ustat(2) failed and setthe errno to 116 : Stale NFS file handle ustat02 2 FAIL : ustat(2) failed to produce expected error; 14, errno: EFAULT and got 116 It appears sometime between 2.6.21 and 2.6.22-rc1 some changes to NFS got introduced that cause this. was wondering about any ideas while I try to debug what's going on. thanks - k ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs