From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/3] svc: gnb review cleanup for transport switch Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:41:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20071012154124.GB1025@fieldses.org> References: <20071011022356.3501.63859.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> <20071011203029.GE22823@fieldses.org> <1192140282.7491.33.camel@trinity.ogc.int> <20071011220820.GF22823@fieldses.org> <1192202234.30080.21.camel@trinity.ogc.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: neilb@suse.de, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, gnb@sgi.com To: Tom Tucker Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgMdf-0004VK-Eh for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:41:23 -0700 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214] helo=fieldses.org) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1IgMdj-0000uq-HR for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:41:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1192202234.30080.21.camel@trinity.ogc.int> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 10:17:14AM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 18:08 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 05:04:42PM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote: > > > I think I found the problem. The patchset is not caching the auth data > > > properly. This causes the server to fail the setting of the client id > > > with a 10018 error. > > > > > > I'll send a patch off tonight....sorry :-\ > > A quick update. The problem is not what I thought it was, but I did > discover some interesting things: > > - If you wait 60 seconds after the nfs4 mount, everything works fine. > You can run connectathon and the world is happy. Before the 60 seconds > you get the hang. Curiously, there are connection management timers in > the client that have this value. Oh, well that may be just the grace period--we don't generally allow any opens for the first lease time (45 seconds by default, I think?) (We should be smarter and skip the grace period in cases where we know no former clients held state on the server. I'm hoping that'll be fixed in the next month.) > - It looks like the module load logic that is down in the > crypto_alloc_hash path is not working properly. Maybe the module name > changed or something, or maybe it always worked this way and I'm > confused, but you have to manually load md5 for nfs4 to work > > - It looks like the callback path is still broken. It's not the port > number, it's the IP address. Since I moved the IP address, it's likely > that I'm the culprit. OK, thanks. --b. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs