From: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC,
	PATCH 0/3] svc: gnb review cleanup for transport switch
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:40:26 -0500
Message-ID: <1192225226.30080.34.camel@trinity.ogc.int>
References: <20071011022356.3501.63859.stgit@dell3.ogc.int>
	<20071011203029.GE22823@fieldses.org>
Reply-To: tom@opengridcomputing.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: neilb@suse.de, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, gnb@sgi.com
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071011203029.GE22823@fieldses.org>
Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net

On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 16:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:23:56PM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote:
> > This patchset implements cleanup that is primarily driven by Greg Bank's 
> > review of the transport switch. A summary follows:
> 
> With your latest patches (and tronds, and mine), I'm getting a failure
> at the start of basic connectathon tests which I haven't tracked down
> yet.  One obvious oddity in the network trace, though, is that the
> server is retransmitting its reply to an open.  Is there any chance this
> could be a problem with the deferral code?
> 

Bruce:

Do you have this tree anywhere I could clone it and try and figure out
what's going on?

Thanks,
Tom
> I'll keep investigating.
> 
> --b.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs