From: Tom Tucker Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 00/35] SVC Transport Switch Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:18:28 -0500 Message-ID: <1191341908.1565.5.camel@trinity.ogc.int> References: <20071001191426.3250.15371.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> <20071002152558.GC21675@fieldses.org> Reply-To: tom@opengridcomputing.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: neilb@suse.de, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, gnb@sgi.com To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IckTH-0003V9-H4 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:19:43 -0700 Received: from 209-198-142-2-host.prismnet.net ([209.198.142.2] helo=smtp.opengridcomputing.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1IckTM-0007Ke-9f for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:19:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20071002152558.GC21675@fieldses.org> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 11:25 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 02:14:26PM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote: > > This is rev 2 of the new pluggable transport switch for > > RPC servers. This version includes two new patches: one to add a field > > for keeping track of a transport specific header that precedes the > > RPC header for deferral processing, and one that cleans up some > > left over references to svc_sock in transport independent code. > > Thanks! I've replaced this in for-mm at Awesome, thanks. > > git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-mm > > But still haven't taken the time to read through it carefully. > > The review comments seem to mostly be on small stuff. Are there any > doubts about the basic approach? > Not architecturally, however I was initially concerned about the size and scope of the changes. I think we're passed that at this point, so I'm comfortable with the approach. > By the way, are the only three transport classes we can forsee for now > udp, tcp, and rdma? > Those are the ones that I am directly working on. I don't know of any others that are imminent. > --b. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs