From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 00/33] SVC Transport Switch
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:58:45 -0400
Message-ID: <20071001155845.GB10719@fieldses.org>
References: <20070927045751.12677.98896.stgit@dell3.ogc.int>
	<18172.34896.98978.904440@notabene.brown>
	<1191001147.10604.101.camel@trinity.ogc.int>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Chuck Lever <cel@citi.umich.edu>, gnb@sgi.com
To: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
Return-path: <nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92]
	helo=mail.sourceforge.net)
	by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IcNwV-0000mw-Oq
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:16:25 -0700
Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214] helo=fieldses.org)
	by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.44) id 1IcNfZ-0004ig-Ii
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:58:54 -0700
In-Reply-To: <1191001147.10604.101.camel@trinity.ogc.int>
List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability,
	and testing." <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=nfs>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:39:07PM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 14:51 +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> > Just a few minor issues as noted in previous emails.  Most of them can
> > be addressed by incremental patches rather than respinning the whole
> > series.  I'm just not sure about where the IP-address info should
> > live.  Maybe other people have opinions???
> > 
> 
> I've already redone the patchset for whitespace cleanup and to handle a
> few checkpatch.pl style issues. How about if I roll in your suggestions,
> repost the whole thing

Fine by me.

--b.

> and then go to incremental after that?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs