From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH nfs-utils 1/3] probe_port should not try other versions in a version was explicitly given. Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 13:02:14 +1100 Message-ID: <18218.34086.347685.663123@notabene.brown> References: <1193894817-20622-1-git-send-email-neilb@suse.de> <1193894817-20622-2-git-send-email-neilb@suse.de> <4729FEF1.2070903@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Steve Dickson To: chuck.lever@oracle.com Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InlrW-0003Bi-Cl for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:02:19 -0700 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1Inlra-0002RK-Hs for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:02:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: message from Chuck Lever on Thursday November 1 List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Thursday November 1, chuck.lever@oracle.com wrote: > > Time to add another case to our list of regression tests. > What! What a list of regression tests for nfs-utils (or even NFS in general?). That would be awesome. NeilBrown ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs