From: joropo@pioneerwireless.net (JOhn ROss POrter)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:10:02 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] AVC denials from cups
In-Reply-To: <20080826120833.GA22352@ldl.fc.hp.com>
References: <48B2BFF4.1000704@pioneerwireless.net>
	<20080826120833.GA22352@ldl.fc.hp.com>
Message-ID: <48B446FA.1090609@pioneerwireless.net>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com



Matt Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:21:40AM -0400, JOhn ROss POrter wrote:
>   
>
> Is the driver included with the hplip package? 
show following from /home/joropo/.hplip/hplip.conf
[installation]
version = 2.8.7
date_time = 08/10/08 09:51:53
In addition to 2.8.7 I have directories&files refelecting 2.8.5 & 2.8.2

>  You might be able to
> look there for version information.  If your on a Debian based distro it
> might be in hpijs.
>   
using fedora 9 with kernel 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686
> When you say the other driver does not cause the same problems, are you
> using the same configuration to setup the printer?  Specifically the
> same device URI and PPD file?  
different URI's
no AVC -- socket://192.168.1.105:9100
w/AVC -- hp:/net/OfficeJet_G85?ip=192.168.1.105 (was created 
auto-magically by hplip install procedure. Additionally, extra 
functionality enabled with this device [scanning and printer display 
feedback])
PPD files more difficult to distinguish.
Both appear in cups as *Printer Driver:* HP OfficeJet G85 Foomatic/hpijs 
(recommended)
but I can not find direct feedback about any version differences between 
these two. (expect there is some.)
> And these both point to the same printer?
>   
yes, same physical device.
> -matt
>
>