From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:32:20 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] mls.patch
In-Reply-To: <1223305650.2165.16.camel@gorn>
References: <48DBDC51.8000206@redhat.com> <1223305650.2165.16.camel@gorn>
Message-ID: <48EA4BA4.1070903@redhat.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:45 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F10/mls.patch
>>
>> Joe this is the patch I have off of current reference policy.   Is this
>> correct or should I use reference policy mls?
> 
> This has a problem: It makes the xserver module required in the base
> module.
> 
Should this constraint be moved to xserver.te then?