From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:08:28 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] mls.patch
In-Reply-To: <48EA4BA4.1070903@redhat.com>
References: <48DBDC51.8000206@redhat.com> <1223305650.2165.16.camel@gorn>
	<48EA4BA4.1070903@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1223316508.2165.27.camel@gorn>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 13:32 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:45 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F10/mls.patch
> >>
> >> Joe this is the patch I have off of current reference policy.   Is this
> >> correct or should I use reference policy mls?
> > 
> > This has a problem: It makes the xserver module required in the base
> > module.
> > 
> Should this constraint be moved to xserver.te then?

Unfortunately that won't work as constraints don't work in modules.

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150