From: russell@coker.com.au (Russell Coker)
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:25:51 +1000
Subject: [refpolicy] Another shot at Oident daemon.
In-Reply-To: <1223301932.2165.0.camel@gorn>
References: <1220712598.30664.3.camel@sulphur.notebook.internal>
	<1223301932.2165.0.camel@gorn>
Message-ID: <200810070725.53973.russell@coker.com.au>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Tuesday 07 October 2008 01:05, "Christopher J. PeBenito" 
<cpebenito@tresys.com> wrote:
> > Please see attachment.
>
> Merged, with a few tweaks.

With the huge number of ident daemons, why does the policy need to be named 
after this one?

Are we going to have pidentd_t, midentd_t, etc as well?

-- 
russell at coker.com.au
http://etbe.coker.com.au/          My Blog

http://www.coker.com.au/sponsorship.html Sponsoring Free Software development