From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:52:09 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] Another shot at Oident daemon.
In-Reply-To: <200810070725.53973.russell@coker.com.au>
References: <1220712598.30664.3.camel@sulphur.notebook.internal>
	<1223301932.2165.0.camel@gorn>
	<200810070725.53973.russell@coker.com.au>
Message-ID: <1223470329.2165.53.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 06:25 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 October 2008 01:05, "Christopher J. PeBenito" 
> <cpebenito@tresys.com> wrote:
> > > Please see attachment.
> >
> > Merged, with a few tweaks.
> 
> With the huge number of ident daemons, why does the policy need to be named 
> after this one?
> 
> Are we going to have pidentd_t, midentd_t, etc as well?

Well if the policy works with little or no modification, I don't have a
problem renaming it to a generic name.

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150