From: justinmattock@gmail.com (Justin Mattock) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:06:41 -0800 Subject: [refpolicy] new svn refpolicy difficuties: In-Reply-To: <1228336248.903.1.camel@gorn> References: <1228112352.3841.13.camel@unix> <1228223603.9691.19.camel@gorn> <1228233441.2973.17.camel@unix> <1228244012.9691.22.camel@gorn> <1228246875.2928.1.camel@unix> <1228310523.9691.387.camel@gorn> <1228336248.903.1.camel@gorn> Message-ID: To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 08:49 -0800, Justin Mattock wrote: >> with the newrole mechanism, If >> I log in as sysadm_r, then change roles to >> user_r, I see the: >> allow newrole user_r process transition >> (but can never be put into the policy?) >> With the older policies I would >> initialialy login as syadm_r, then >> login to staff_t for starting the internet, >> then user_r for entertainment needs >> but with this new mechanism, seems to >> be something different!! > > I fixed a mistake in the role change constraint. svn up and it should > work again. > > -- > Chris PeBenito > Tresys Technology, LLC > (410) 290-1411 x150 > > Cool thanks for looking into this, unfortunately I can't get this thing to compile to get to the point of changing roles. unless you're talking about: git clone http://oss.tresys.com/git/selinux.git then I can go ahead and do a git-pull and see If I get that annoying newrole *_t process transition thing.. (In any case my head hurts, I need a beer) ;^) -- Justin P. Mattock