From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:47:39 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] xserver: Dropping class information from type names
In-Reply-To: <4A8F317E.3020203@tycho.nsa.gov>
References: <4A8F317E.3020203@tycho.nsa.gov>
Message-ID: <1251118062.8357.1.camel@gorn>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 19:45 -0400, Eamon Walsh wrote:
> Many of the X object manager types have an object class name built-in, 
> e.g. input_xevent_t, user_xproperty_t, security_xextension_t.  I feel as 
> though the class part is redundant and can be dropped.  This would 
> result in some existing types being reused for new object classes, e.g. 
> user_t:x_property.
> 
> Any objection to this?

I need to see the patch to say for sure, but it sounds ok.

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150