From: nicky726@gmail.com (Nicky726)
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:15:23 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] Basic policy for KDE and Konqueror
In-Reply-To: <1250103483.19221.31.camel@notebook2.grift.internal>
References: <200908121440.21006.Nicky726@gmail.com>
	<1250103483.19221.31.camel@notebook2.grift.internal>
Message-ID: <200909032215.24050.Nicky726@gmail.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Hello,

I've been reviewing and testing my policy for Konqueror according to Dominick 
Grift's comments. Now I've got confused with the dbus affair:

Dne St 12. srpna 2009 20:58:03 Dominick Grift napsal(a): 
> use proper dbus interfaces (not dbus unconfined)

The thing is that Konqueror starts only with dbus_unconfined(). If I use 
dbus_system_bus_client() I got message, that Konqueror can't be registered 
with dbus, as there is already another one registered. If I use 
dbus_session_bus_client() I got absolutely no output. In both cases Konqueror 
won't start and no AVC denials are displayed.

As I looked into Evolution and Mozilla policies sources, there are only this 
two interfaces used. Are there some other steps needed for it to work? Or is 
there some better suited interfaces? Do you have other suggestions?

Thanks for your time,
Ondrej Vadinsky

-- 
Don`t it always seem to go
That you don`t know what you`ve got
Till it`s gone.

		(Joni Mitchell)