From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:59:37 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] Fwd: nagios policy patches
Message-ID: <4AE19AA9.6040706@redhat.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com


Here is some changes made to nagios by some one within Red Hat, based on RHEL5.  It needs some cleanup, but I wanted to bring up for discussion whether we want this number of booleans.  Since I never use nagios, I wanted to know if this is the way we should go.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: nagios.fc.patch
Url: http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20091023/7ac651b1/attachment.pl 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: nagios.te.patch
Url: http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20091023/7ac651b1/attachment-0001.pl